Yeah, I don't like the sheer level of waste on big productions - it just goes against everything I believe in as an indie! I've recently been hitting investors with an attractive package from LA (names attached, etc) with a cash budget of $11M - at least $3M of that is sheer greed or waste (I'm not paying an unheard-of director $400k, I'm not paying an unheard-of scriptwriter $400k either - unless they're names that will help attract finance to the project, that's just waste in my eyes). Similarly, why employ *fifteen* drivers for what's mostly a static shoot? They're not on the screen so I don't want to pay them plus catering and board if twelve of them sleep the whole day.
Call me callous, but this attitude of waste is unhelpful. Don't get me wrong, spend the money on-screen, pay people well to do their jobs, but for a mostly studio shoot with a couple of EXT shots, why pay two complete 4-man camera crews when they'll slow down the shoot (by blocking sitelines so you get 2 average shots instead of one great one) and drive up catering costs by spending the whole day drinking tea and whining? And that fat budget is deterring investors - they look at the backsheets and just turn it away.
I guess a lot comes from "teamster"/over-unionisation attitudes. I'm very liberal at heart, but there's such an attitude of greed and laziness on big shoots, which is why I think indie shooting is much more exciting. Spend all your cash on the screen, have enough good people around, pay them well. Keep the pace up, don't waste money, have a big party afterwards
</rant>