Atom (23rd Aug 2010 06:21)

We're very aware of the film's shortcomings and pitfalls- they've all been well-responded to and clearly-outlined- and we've grown as filmmakers and responded in kind to that sort of thing. That's sort of the thing, I suppose. Anyone who put even a second into looking at the previous responses would know it's all mostly been addressed and thoroughly talked-about. And while I'm all for resurrecting my own movies () and continuing conversation, that wasn't this. This guy just wants to be a snarky snob. And I'm not just saying this on my movie. Look at his other posts on movies in the cinema. I'll be childish all I want for little things like this- the movie's all but retired itself from the cinema already, we've 'been there done that'. And this guy's an ass. And the best place for me to address him as such is where, I suppose, he addresses me. So whatever.

Sollthar (23rd Aug 2010 06:14)

However unpleasantly rude his comment was worded (judging from his other posts, he's got his fair share of ettiquette to learn himself), he's essentially right though. Your film doesn't work - which is why most don't understand it and you didn't win nor get your usual high ratings for it. And if you're actually that "past it", you'll know that's the case. That doesn't disqualify you as filmmakers entirely though, just renders this an effort that doesn't fully work. We've all had that and we all will have more of that as we continue to try. Heh, exactly my thought Evan.

Evman (23rd Aug 2010 06:12)

An adequately childish set of responses to a childish post. And there is balance again in the world...