After finding a winning edge at last year's Dallas 24-Hour Video Race, Atomic Productions approached 2007 with a slightly different idea in mind. The result is "Redemption".
The film is told through the third-person narrative of Watts, an overly philosophical and rhetorically ambiguous man. As the story progresses, Watts retells the decline of one James Falcone; a good kid turned bad by drugs and negative influence. As we watch Watts comment on Falcone's life, the question is beckoned: how far is the point of no return?
This film was produced in under 24 hours and met certain parameters, which were as follows. The required location was flagpole, the prop a musical instrument, the line of dialogue "you don't owe me anything", and a theme of "wrong turn". This year we wanted better technicals and higher production values, and I think we succeeded in that regard. The script, however, may not make the greatest deal of sense.
It is with that, we ask you, that you take this for what it is: a movie made in 24 hours that attempted to be the coolest-looking, drama-filled end result we could produce. Are there a few cheesy moments? Yes. Does the story make complete sense? No. But we stuck to the fact that we could make something fun, dramatic, and cool to watch, and "Redemption", in our opinions, is that.
Enjoy.

| Film w/ Producer Commentary | Quicktime | 320 x 240 | 5m 34s | 29.39MB | Download | |
| Film - Medium Quality | Quicktime | 320 x 240 | 4m 28s | 22.57MB | Download | |
ben3308 (25th Jun 2007 23:06)
Thanks for th comments, Plainly Canadian, you seem to be a very insightful guy around the forums, so I'm glad you've taken the time to watch this movie.
You couldn't tell there was color correction?
Didn't the green tint and uber-high contrast give it away? ![]()
Plainly (24th Jun 2007 19:40)
Considering that you did that in 24 hours, that's a really good movie. The only problem with it is, as you said, that it didn't make much sense.
Artistically, your movie was very good. I don't know wether or not you did any colour correction, but the colour quality was very good.
Good job! ![]()
ben3308 (24th Jun 2007 08:25)
I think that's precisely why the attempt is so bad.
![]()
Copyright © 2001-2008 FXhome Limited (UK)