Garrison (9th Mar 2007 23:44)
neoglitz wrote:
Question Sollthar:
This is the second review I have read where you gave the film a lower rating due to the high rating of the filmmaker. I am very curious as to how you can justify your logic? What are you meaning to imply when you say:
"I'd have given it 3 stars, but your own 5 star vote took it down to 1."
The reason I ask you say? BECAUSE YOU RATED YOUR OWN MOVIE A FIVE!!
Don't be so pompous toward other people. I respected a lot of the things you have created (tuts and movies) until I noticed that simple fact.
I think back in the day (2002) was when people would vote for their own flick. But somewhere along the way, it became looked down on, but not necessarily a written rule.
I ain't taking sides here, just informing.
neoglitz (9th Mar 2007 23:21)
Question Sollthar:
This is the second review I have read where you gave the film a lower rating due to the high rating of the filmmaker. I am very curious as to how you can justify your logic? What are you meaning to imply when you say:
"I'd have given it 3 stars, but your own 5 star vote took it down to 1."
The reason I ask you say? BECAUSE YOU RATED YOUR OWN MOVIE A FIVE!!
Don't be so pompous toward other people. I respected a lot of the things you have created (tuts and movies) until I noticed that simple fact.
